Nevada’s election results could take several days to report, but that’s because the vote counting and certification process is thorough and is meant to ensure every legal voter is able to cast their ballot, and that each of those ballots are verified. Here’s what to know about the vote counting process in Nevada, from beginning to end.
A pesar de las mentiras sobre el fraude electoral, la votación anticipada se ha desarrollado en gran medida sin problemas hasta ahora en Nevada.
Las urnas cierran a las 7 p.m. el martes 5 de noviembre, pero los votantes de Nevada pueden tardar unos días en saber quién ganó algunas de las elecciones clave en el estado.
It may take voters a few days to know who’s won some of the key races in Nevada, and election experts have cautioned against reading too heavily into the early results that come in on election night before all votes are counted.
Amid ongoing lies and conspiracies about voter fraud from far-right circles, Nevadans are expressing confidence in the state’s election system and those involved in counting the votes.
Brown ran a company that served as a pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) and has been a vocal defender of PBMs, which have been shown to raise drug costs for patients. He also opposed Democratic measures to lower prescription drugs costs and to allow Medicare to negotiate for lower drug prices.
The Nevada Supreme Court noted in its opinion, which was posted by Democracy Docket, that the RNC identified 24 non-postmarked mail ballots that were received by Clark County after this year’s June primary election day, but they provided no evidence regarding the partisan lean of those ballots. The lack of a postmark “occurs as the result of random postal service operations,” the court noted.
Panelists discussed the intersection of climate change and its impacts on Latino communities, Nevada’s specific struggles with air quality, housing, and water infrastructure, and how federal investments are transforming Nevada into a clean energy powerhouse.
The groups opposing the measure have expressed concern that the reforms included in Question 3 could actually lead to voters being disenfranchised by making voting more confusing and time-consuming. A series of studies suggests those concerns are valid.
