tr?id=&ev=PageView&noscript=

Opinion: Trump’s tariffs are a costly burden

Opinion: Trump’s tariffs are a costly burden

WASHINGTON, DC - MARCH 26: U.S. President Donald Trump displays a signed an executive order in the Oval Office of the White House on March 26, 2025 in Washington, DC. President Trump announced 25% tariffs on all foreign-made cars. (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)

By Maite Guerra, M.P.S

May 7, 2025

Tariffs have long been a tool in trade policy, but their impact is often misunderstood. At their core, tariffs are taxes imposed on imported goods, making those products more expensive for consumers and businesses. While proponents say that tariffs protect domestic industries and create jobs, the reality is far more complex and often detrimental. Under the Trump administration, new tariffs are being imposed on key imports, and Americans are paying the price.

Tariffs are essentially taxes on imported goods. When a foreign product enters the U.S., the government imposes a fee that raises the price of that product. The goal is often to make domestic alternatives more competitive. However, in practice, tariffs frequently backfire by increasing costs for businesses and consumers alike. Companies that rely on imported materials or goods must either absorb the higher costs, reducing profits and potentially cutting jobs, or pass the costs onto consumers, leading to higher prices on everyday items.

The latest round of tariffs implemented by the Trump administration targets a wide range of products, including steel and aluminum, automobiles, and consumer goods. These tariffs affect Americans in several ways. First, they lead to higher prices on consumer goods. Many everyday products, from electronics to household appliances, are becoming more expensive due to tariffs on imports from China and other countries. This means that American families are paying more at the checkout counter for essential goods.

Additionally, tariffs increase costs for businesses, likely hurting small businesses the most. Manufacturers that rely on imported materials, such as steel and aluminum, are facing higher costs, making American-made products more expensive and less competitive in global markets. While tariffs are intended to protect domestic industries, they often have the opposite effect by causing job losses in affected industries. When costs rise, companies may be forced to cut jobs or move operations overseas to remain competitive.

Moreover, tariffs are straining relationships with key allies, including Canada, Mexico, and European nations. These countries have responded with retaliatory tariffs, targeting American exports such as agricultural products, automobiles, and whiskey. These retaliatory measures make it harder for American businesses to sell their products abroad, leading to decreased demand, lower revenues, and potential job losses. Industries that once flourished due to strong international trade relationships are now struggling under the weight of these tariffs.

Canada has imposed tariffs on American dairy products, agricultural goods, and steel, affecting farmers and manufacturers who rely on cross-border trade. Mexico has placed tariffs on American pork, cheese, and whiskey, which directly harm U.S. farmers and food producers. The European Union has retaliated with tariffs on American motorcycles, bourbon, and jeans, negatively impacting industries that rely on exports to European markets.

Despite the clear economic harm, there is widespread misinformation about tariffs. The Trump administration often portrays tariffs as a tax on foreign nations, suggesting that China or the EU is paying the price. However, in reality, American consumers and businesses are the ones bearing the burden. When tariffs increase the cost of imported goods, those costs are passed down to American buyers, not foreign governments.

Additionally, the administration argued that tariffs would bring jobs back to the U.S., but the evidence suggests otherwise. Instead of reviving manufacturing, tariffs have led to supply chain disruptions, higher business costs, and economic uncertainty, making it more difficult for American companies to compete.

If the U.S. wants to maintain strong economic growth and protect American workers, the current tariff strategy must be reevaluated. Ending unnecessary tariffs and removing tariffs on essential imports would immediately lower costs for businesses and consumers. Rebuilding trade relationships by strengthening ties with allies like Canada, Mexico, and the European Union is crucial for long-term economic stability. Supporting domestic industries through innovation, rather than tariffs, is a more sustainable approach. Finally, providing relief for affected workers and businesses is essential. Small businesses and workers harmed by tariffs need support, whether through financial aid, tax relief, or targeted economic policies.

Trump’s tariff policies are a costly experiment that is placing an unnecessary burden on American consumers, businesses, and international relationships. While they may be marketed as a way to strengthen the economy, tariffs act as a hidden tax, driving up prices and putting American jobs at risk. To truly protect American workers and industries, the U.S. must adopt policies that promote economic cooperation, innovation, and fair trade, not a reckless tariff war that harms those it claims to help.

  • Maite Guerra, M.P.S

    Maite Guerra serves as the Research Manager at Battle Born Progress and the Institute for a Progressive Nevada, where she spearheads research initiatives aimed at countering disinformation targeting the Latino/Hispanic community in Nevada. She holds a Bachelor's Degree in Political Science and Criminal Justice from the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, where she also gained valuable experience as a staffing assistant for Congressman Steven Horford. Maite recently earned her Master's Degree in American Politics with a specialization in American Politics from New York University. During her time at NYU, she contributed her expertise to organizations such as Make the Road, The Progressive Turnout Project, and the Elizabeth Brickfield Campaign. Her commitment to social justice extends beyond her professional endeavors, as evidenced by her volunteer work as a legal intern for the Asian Community Development Council and with the ACLU of Nevada. With a profound passion for the political sphere, Maite endeavors to continue advocating for equitable policies and representation, aspiring to foster positive change in communities nationwide through her research, advocacy, and activism.

Related Stories
Opinion: Project 2025 is a Nuclear Disaster for Nevada

Opinion: Project 2025 is a Nuclear Disaster for Nevada

For decades, one issue has united Nevada politicians across local, state, and federal levels: Yucca Mountain. Most Nevadans believe developing Yucca Mountain as a national nuclear waste dump is a dead issue. However, the worrisome Project 2025 manifesto from the...

Who is J.D. Vance? Here’s what to know about Trump’s VP pick.

Who is J.D. Vance? Here’s what to know about Trump’s VP pick.

Vance has compared abortion to murder and slavery, has criticized divorce, and has suggested people in “violent” marriages should try to work things out. He’s additionally said he wants to ban pornography, and has blamed a school shooting on “fatherlessness.”

Share This