
Photo Courtesy of Nevada Assembly Democrats
Two years ago, I, along with countless others across Nevada watched in shock and horror as the United States Supreme Court handed down a decision that flung America back to the Dark Ages. That day, for the first time in our nation’s history, women possessed fewer rights than our mothers and our grandmothers before them.
Today marks the grim two-year anniversary of the Dobbs Decision, where the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, stripping away constitutional protections for abortion rights. This regressive ruling flies in the face of the 7-2 opinion recognizing precedent case law that a right of personal privacy exists under the Constitution in the First Amendment and in the concept of liberty guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment;thus, safeguarding access to abortion.
So, I, along with millions of women across the country, demand to know: What has changed? How can a woman’s right to make decisions about her own body be so callously discarded, no longer protected under the constitutional right to privacy?
A woman’s right to privacy should – and must – be shielded from the clutches of extremists who have demonstrated that their goals reach far beyond just abortion; they seek to dismantle women’s access to commonsense reproductive care entirely. We witnessed this sinister agenda earlier this year when the Alabama Supreme Court ruled to prohibit IVF treatment, a lifeline for women battling infertility.
The stakes could not be higher. If we permit extremists to dictate access to reproductive care, they will not stop at abortion.They are bound and determined to control every aspect of women’s reproductive health. By overturning Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court threw open the doors for politics to invade our most private medical decisions. Extremists will not rest until they have eradicated abortion, IVF, and even contraception.
Regardless of your stance on abortion, make no mistake: every woman in this country is under attack, because our healthcare is under siege. The catastrophic effects of denying women access to reproductive care are well-documented: unsafe abortions, a surge in STDs, and complicated pregnancies that can end in death.
I, along with my Democratic colleagues in the Nevada State Legislature, have stood our ground, passing crucial legislation to safeguard access to abortion and reproductive care. We passed Senate Bill 131, which protects Nevada healthcare providers and out-of-state patients seeking reproductive healthcare here. We also passed Assembly Bill 383 aimed to secure Nevadans access to reproductive healthcare; unfortunately, it was vetoed by Governor Joe Lombardo.
On this somber anniversary of the Dobbs decision, our resolve must be unyielding. We must rise and elect legislators in Nevada who understand what’s at stake and will defend women’s access to reproductive and abortion care. In the upcoming election, reproductive care must be at the forefront of our fight. Although Nevada is a pro-choice state, there are candidates on the ballot who seek to dismantle these rights – including our very own Governor who has already vetoed essential protections for women’s reproductive rights.
To truly safeguard abortion and reproductive care, we must educate the public about the reality and benefits of comprehensive reproductive healthcare. Abortion must be accessible to all, so that women from marginalized communities are not forced to choose unsafe abortions nor denied basic services. The fight is far from over, and on this anniversary, I am more determined than ever to continue this battle. We must not relent. We must fight back with everything we have. Will you join me?
Related: Opinion: Two years since Roe fell, the fight to protect women’s health care is as important as ever

Supreme Court limits nationwide injunctions, but fate of Trump birthright citizenship order unclear
WASHINGTON (AP) — A divided Supreme Court on Friday ruled that individual judges lack the authority to grant nationwide injunctions, but the...

Did Gov. Joe Lombardo just sign a dangerous veto for reproductive care? This Nevada doctor says yes
Dr. Margaux Lazarin said she isn’t worried about patients having info about doctors—she’s concerned about who else might see the prescription...

Trump administration revokes guidance requiring hospitals to provide emergency abortions
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump administration announced on Tuesday that it would revoke guidance to the nation's hospitals that directed them to...

Five reproductive rights bills were sent to Gov. Joe Lombardo’s desk—here’s what they’d do
Gov. Joe Lombardo, a Republican, has a choice to make very soon—break with many Republicans across the country and sign reproductive freedom...

House GOP fast-tracks budget bill that would cut off Medicaid funding to Planned Parenthood
The budget package proposes steep health care cuts—and includes a new push to block patients from accessing reproductive care. In a 30-24 party-line...

Nevada’s “parental consent” abortion law will go into effect April 30, putting vulnerable minors at greater risk
A law that has been on hold for 40 years—one that requires parents or guardians to be notified before a minor receives an abortion—will soon be...